Updated: No Knockout Bonus Included In Petruzelli’s Contract As Lappen Claimed

Seth Petruzelli
More EliteXC Heat photos at CombatLifestyle.com

In response to Seth Petruzelli’s comments on the “The Monsters in Orlando” show on 104.1 FM in Orlando the Monday following his bout with Kimbo Slice, former EliteXC Head of Fight Operations Jeremy Lappen claimed that Petruzelli was referring to a knockout bonus, not a bribe to keep the fight standing as widely suspected.

Lappen’s claim was made two days following Petruzelli’s appearance on 104.1 FM in a report published by SI.com’s Josh Gross. In the report, Lappen confirmed a guaranteed knockout bonus was included in Petruzelli’s revised fight contract.

However, when the official findings of the Florida DPBR’s investigation into the matter were released, something caught our eye. Specifically, Executive Director Thomas Molloy’s review of the fight contract where it states, “there was nothing written in the contract to indicate Mr. Petruzelli would be compensated by fighting in a certain manner.”

In a response to a request made by MMAConvert.com to the Florida DBPR for further clarification of that statement as to whether a “knockout bonus” clause was present in the contract, Florida DBPR press secretary Alexis Antonacci stated, “There was not a ‘knockout bonus.’ There was a win bonus.” The Florida DBPR also provided MMAConvert.com with an electronic copy of Petruzelli’s revised fight contract, and we can indeed confirm that there was no clause for a “knockout bonus” included as Lappen claimed, only the $35,000 to fight and $15,000 to win declarations as Florida’s report stated.

Antonacci also confirmed to MMAConvert.com that if sufficient reason is found to warrant further investigation of this situation, a new case could be opened by the Florida DBPR.

[UPDATE 10/28/08 2:20AM ET] – It has been brought to our attention by Rob Maysey below that there are additional agreements in which the clause for the “knockout bonus” may have been present. We are currently attempting to confirm with the Florida DBPR if it is possible that the clause Lappen spoke of is present on a document they were not provided, especially given the last-minute nature of the situation. We’ll let you know what we find out.

In the meantime, if that was the case, one would think Lappen or someone from EliteXC would have provided Florida with that documentation during their investigation to back up EliteXC’s explanation of Seth’s comments. If it existed, why not provide it immediately as proof and put the whole thing to bed?

Read more about: EliteXC,Jeremy Lappen,Kimbo Slice,ProElite,Seth Petruzelli

Related Posts

No related posts.

We have a new commenting system and comment policy. Read about them here and here.

  • Pingback: Steve Barry: Seth Petruzelli contract shows no knockout bonus, contradicting the claims of Jeremy Lappen | FightOpinion.com - Your Global Connection to the Fight Industry.

  • Drew

    Nice work Barry.

    • http://www.mmaconvert.com Steve Barry

      Thanks Drew

  • http://www.mmafa.tv/blog Rob Maysey

    You won’t find it in the bout agreement, but instead, in the promotional agreement. Why aren’t all of these agreements filed with the ACs? Why are payments hidden?

    In short, why are the rules for MMA any different than for boxing?

    • http://www.mmaconvert.com Steve Barry

      Rob, I’m sure you’re much more familiar with fight contracts, etc. than we are, however based upon Gross’ SI.com report, we believe what was provided to us from the Florida DBPR is what Lappen was referring to.

      From Gross’ report:

      While EliteXC Fight Operations Chief, Jeremy Lappen, declined to discuss a dollar amount, he confirmed the presence of a guaranteed knockout bonus in Petruzelli’s revised fight contract, which also included a higher purse for the trouble of fighting Slice.

      Unlike the UFC’s lucrative performance-based bonus structure awarded after each event for the best knockout, submission and fight, Lappen said a third to a half of all bout agreements offered by EliteXC come with an assured knockout clause.

      The document we were sent was titled, “Letter Of Agreement By Promoter and Participant” and was represented to us as the contract. I understand promotional agreements are different, but based upon Gross’s report, that does not appear to be what Lappen was referring to.

      If it’s proved that we are wrong, we will gladly amend our report.

      • http://www.mmafa.tv Rob Maysey

        Steve,

        I too have received very similar responses in the past. There are, however, up to 4 different agreements that are signed by the fighter. (i) A bout agreement presented to the athletic agreement, (ii) a promotional bout agreement, (iii) a promotional agreement, and (iv) a side-letter agreement.

        I am not sure if anyone is wrong–just not sure anyone has seen all agreements that are signed. Just look at the statements Seth has made regarding total compensation–you know for certain an agreement is not represented in what was provided to you.

        Bizarre–I received no response from the DBPR.

        Good job Steve.

        Regards,

        Rob Maysey

        • http://www.mmaconvert.com Steve Barry

          I see what you’re saying Rob. If such an agreement with a “knockout bonus” clause existed though, wouldn’t have EliteXC provided that as support for their explanation to the Florida DBPR for their investigation?

        • http://www.mmaconvert.com Steve Barry

          Thanks for the assistance btw.

        • http://www.mmaconvert.com Steve Barry

          Oh and one more thing. As far as the extra $50k or whatever it was that he made, who’s to say it had to be written into any agreement?

          If they are in fact guilty of what is alleged, that could account for the extra compensation, which is my understanding of what most people suspect. And they obviously wouldn’t have put that in ink. At least, I would assume they aren’t that stupid.

  • http://www.mmafa.tv Rob Maysey

    Sorry–

    (i) above should read “a bout agreement presented to the athletic commision”